Legal Opinion

Clowdis v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1897No. Sac. No. 242PublishedCited by 27 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of tbe Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an -order denying a new trial. E. W. Risley, Judge. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe court. Tbe corporation defendant was not chargeable with tbe knowledge acquired by its mere ministerial servants. (4 Thompson on Corporations, sec. 5237; Pomeroy’s Equity Jurisprudence, sec. 668; Tiedeman on Equity, sec. 100; Fairfield Sav. Bank v. Chase, 72 Me. 226; 89 Am.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from a judgment of tbe Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an -order denying a new trial. E. W. Risley, Judge. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe court. Tbe corporation defendant was not chargeable with tbe knowledge acquired by its mere ministerial servants. (4 Thompson on Corporations, sec. 5237; Pomeroy’s Equity Jurisprudence, sec. 668; Tiedeman on Equity, sec. 100; Fairfield Sav. Bank v. Chase, 72 Me. 226; 89 Am. Rep. 219; Consolidated Coal Co. v. Block etc. Co., 53 Ill. App. 565; Grant v. Cole, 8 Ala. 519; Shaver v. New York etc. Transp. Co., 31 Hun, 55; Stiles v.…

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff recovered damages for injuries inflicted by a vicious bull, the property of defendant. lie averred that, prior to the attack upon him, the bull was of a vicious disposition and dangerous character, and that the fact was known to defendant, its agents, and employees. He also averred that the injury was occasioned by the negligent conduct of defendant’s servants engaged in driving the bull upon a public highway. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial.

The facts disclosed by the evidence are as follows: In April, 1895, the defendant, which was engaged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brice v. . BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Donnelly v. San Francisco Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Laverone v. MangiantiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Ficken v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Higgins v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Doe v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Swain v. TillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Baker v. BorelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Baugh v. BeattyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API