Ficken v. Jones
California Supreme Court
Plaintiff recovered judgment in the' Twelfth District Court, and defendants appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Currey, J.
Action to recover damages for injuries which the plaintiff received from a steer belonging to the defendant Swift, while in the charge of the defendant Jones. While driving the steer-through Brannan street, near Sixth street, in San Francisco, hé became affrighted, and afterwards separated from the herd of cattle to which he belonged. In the effort to capture him *623he became wild and apparently alarmed, and escaped for a time from his keepers, and while at large he ran against the plaintiff, knocking him down and goring him in a terrible manner. The plaintiff charged in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stokes v. SaltonstallSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Boyce v. California Stage Co.California Supreme Court · 1864
- McKinney v. NeilU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1840
3Cited by15 opinions
- Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Kennon v. GilmerMontana Supreme Court · 1885
- Cunningham v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Clowdis v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Towle v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.