Legal Opinion

Doe v. Barnett

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1969No. 269A39PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

The Appellant-Plaintiff, Charles Doe, commenced this action by filing his .complaint on September 2, 1966, the essential allegations of which are:

“1. That on September 6, 1964, the defendants owned certain real estate in St. John, Indiana, on which they resided; that on said real estate the defendants kept and maintained several horses.

2. That on said date the plaintiff and his minor son, Timothy Doe, age 7, were visiting on said premises owned and occupied by the defendants; that at said time and place the defendants invited the plaintiff and his said minor son into a certain corral located…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Fountain v. FilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Mayhew, Huston v. DEISTERIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Woolf v. ChalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
  4. Wozniczka v. McKEANIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Brice v. . BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Bassett v. GlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Podgorny v. Great Central Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Aafco Heating & Air Conditioning Co. v. Northwest Publications, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Letson v. LowmasterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Shaw v. SS Kresge CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API