Swain v. Tillett
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
Defendants assign as error the failure of the court to sustain their respective motions for nonsuit. Radford Tillett contends that he has no responsibility for the deer’s actions because he *51was not its owner. Mrs. Tillett contends that she has no liability since there is no evidence tending to show that she had any knowledge that the deer had developed any dangerous propensities. These contentions must be assayed against the following applicable principles of law:
“Certain animals ferce natures may be domesticated to such an extent as to be classed, in respect of the liability of the owner for…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Spring Co. v. EdgarSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Brice v. . BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Clowdis v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Barber v. HochstrasserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Farrior v. PaytonHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- Endresen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Patterson Ex Rel. Jones v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Miller Ex Rel. Yeager v. SnipesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.