Legal Opinion

International Brotherhood of Police Officers, Local 569 v. City of East Providence

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 25, 2010No. 2008-328-AppealPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GOLDBERG, for the Court.

This ease comes before us on the plaintiffs appeal from a Superior Court decision declaring that the defendant, the City of East Providence and its police department (city or department), acted properly when it discharged Officer Sean Sullivan (Sullivan) for non-disciplinary reasons without employing the hearing procedure required by the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (LEOBOR). 1 The plaintiff, International Brotherhood of Police Officers, Local 569 (union), 2 argues on appeal that Sullivan’s constitutional right of due process was violated…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BidoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  2. Sullivan v. ChafeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  3. In Re DenisewichSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  4. Casco Indemnity Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. Town of North Kingstown v. AlbertSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anthony Bucci v. Lehman Brothers Bank, FSBSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  2. Beacon Mutual Insurance v. Spino Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  3. In Re Review of Proposed Town of New Shoreham ProjectSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  4. Haviland v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  5. Ims v. Town of PortsmouthSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API