Sullivan v. Chafee
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLANDERS, Justice.
We speak here of judicial power and justi-ciability, of indispensable parties and mootness, and of city council budget votes and mayoral vetoes.
The plaintiffs, four current members and one former member of the nine-person Warwick City Council (the council), 1 appeal from a Superior Court declaratory judgment concerning a dispute involving the city’s municipal budget for the fiscal year that ended on June 30, 1997 (FY 1997). The Superior Court’s judgment rejected the plaintiffs’ proposed interpretation of various budgetary provisions contained in the Warwick City…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Morris v. D'AMARIOSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- Burns v. SundlunSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
- G. & D. Taylor & Co. v. R. G. & J. T. PlaceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1856
- Seibert v. ClarkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Grady v. Narragansett Electric Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- State v. Lead Industries, Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- Augur v. AugurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Arnold v. LebelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- City of Cranston v. Rhode Island Laborers' District CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.