Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Chafee

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 14, 1997No. 97-156-AppealPublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLANDERS, Justice.

We speak here of judicial power and justi-ciability, of indispensable parties and mootness, and of city council budget votes and mayoral vetoes.

The plaintiffs, four current members and one former member of the nine-person Warwick City Council (the council), 1 appeal from a Superior Court declaratory judgment concerning a dispute involving the city’s municipal budget for the fiscal year that ended on June 30, 1997 (FY 1997). The Superior Court’s judgment rejected the plaintiffs’ proposed interpretation of various budgetary provisions contained in the Warwick City…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Morris v. D'AMARIOSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. Burns v. SundlunSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  4. G. & D. Taylor & Co. v. R. G. & J. T. PlaceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1856
  5. Seibert v. ClarkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Grady v. Narragansett Electric Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  2. State v. Lead Industries, Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. Augur v. AugurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Arnold v. LebelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  5. City of Cranston v. Rhode Island Laborers' District CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API