Legal Opinion

Town of North Kingstown v. Albert

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 6, 2001No. 99-211-AppealPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOLDBERG, Justice.

This case came before the Court on appeal from a final judgment of the Superior Court entered in favor of Gerry and Susan Albert (the Alberts or defendants) by the Town of North Kingstown (town or plaintiff). The town has asserted that the trial justice erred in denying its request to permanently enjoin defendants from completing excavation on their property to create an irrigation pond designed to provide an adequate water supply to their seventy-acre turf farm. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

The following facts are not in dispute. The Alberts own and operate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brennan v. KirbySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  2. Kaya v. PartingtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. Mongony v. BevilacquaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  4. In Re Advisory to the GovernorSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  5. Palazzolo v. State Ex Rel. TavaresSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Waterman v. CaprioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  2. Keystone Elevator Co. v. Johnson & Wales UniversitySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  3. State v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  4. Hanley v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  5. Heilker v. Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API