United States v. Willie Frank Goolsby
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Appellant brings this appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(2), contending that the district court incorrectly applied the Sen-fencing Guidelines. Specifically, Goolsby contends that the district court erred in applying the criminal history multiple under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(d). We affirm.
FACTS
The facts in this case are not in dispute. On February 6, 1989, appellant escaped from a federal half-way house; appellant remained in a fugitive status until he was arrested on March 21, 1989. Appellant pled guilty to the charge of escape, 18 U.S.C. § 751(a), and was sentenced to a twenty-eight month…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Scott Evan JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Samuel ScrogginsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. William M. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Walter Moray WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Cary Thomas GoldbaumCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Michael J. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Carlyle Eustace Wong, A/K/A Carlyle WongCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. LillyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Imran MandhaiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Christopher WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.