United States v. Christopher Williams
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:
In this case a defendant pleaded guilty to aggravated assault and the district court refused to impose the four-level upward adjustment prescribed by the United States Sentencing Guidelines for the defendant’s use of a dangerous weapon. U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2(b)(2)(B). The district court believed the adjustment constituted impermissible “double counting” since the Guidelines define the base offense of aggravated assault to include assault with a dangerous weapon. We believe, however, that the district court’s view is not consistent with the language or the structure…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Ruben Rocha, Thomas Padilla, Hector Garcia-Garcia, Johnny Robert Hinojosa, and Jose Santos GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ofchinick, Daniel R. (Jr.). Appeal of Daniel Ofchinick, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. HammoudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. David J. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. VizcarraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Michael J. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.