Legal Opinion

United States v. Christopher Williams

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1992No. 91-5399PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

In this case a defendant pleaded guilty to aggravated assault and the district court refused to impose the four-level upward adjustment prescribed by the United States Sentencing Guidelines for the defendant’s use of a dangerous weapon. U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2(b)(2)(B). The district court believed the adjustment constituted impermissible “double counting” since the Guidelines define the base offense of aggravated assault to include assault with a dangerous weapon. We believe, however, that the district court’s view is not consistent with the language or the structure…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. Ruben Rocha, Thomas Padilla, Hector Garcia-Garcia, Johnny Robert Hinojosa, and Jose Santos GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Ofchinick, Daniel R. (Jr.). Appeal of Daniel Ofchinick, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. United States v. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. HammoudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. David J. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. VizcarraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Michael J. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API