Legal Opinion
United States v. William M. Carroll
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1990No. 88-2260PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
This sentence guidelines appeal presents a meritorious assignment of error.
Because we conclude that the sentencing court erred as a matter of law in selecting the numerical value corresponding to the defendant’s “role” in the offense in this case, and as a result necessarily came to a mistaken mathematical conclusion about the appropriate sentence guidelines range, we vacate the sentence and remand the case for resentencing.
I
Before turning to the four meritless and one meritorious issues in this appeal, we should like to say a word, in dicta to be sure, about the ever…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Gordon PennellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Melody ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Daniel Lee, A/K/A "Monkey"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Angel OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- United States v. James E. SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Leonard R. FullerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Earl Thomas AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ernest J. Badaracco, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Harold Benny Jewel, Also Known as "Bear," and Arthur S. Jackson, Also Known as Stevie JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.