Legal Opinion

United States v. Walter Moray Williams

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1989No. 89-50017PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NELSON, Circuit Judge:

Walter Moray Williams appeals his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Williams contends that his due process rights were violated because his adult criminal sentence was enhanced due to prior juvenile adjudications at which he did not have a right to a jury trial. Williams also contends that the district court erroneously categorized his prior commitment to juvenile hall as a term of imprisonment, thereby enhancing his adult sentence. We affirm the sentence imposed by the district court.

FACTS

Williams entered a plea of guilty on October 6, 1988 for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. Leon BradyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Shannon Wayne TigheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Eric N. UngerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Jeffrey Dean BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API