Legal Opinion
United States v. Lilly
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 5, 1994No. 93-1577PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
In this criminal appeal, defendant-appellant William W. Lilly claims that the district court engaged in impermissible “double counting” when calculating the guideline sentencing range (GSR) applicable to his case. Concluding that Lilly’s assignment of error lacks force, we affirm the judgment below.
I
The facts relevant to this appeal are not now disputed. Lilly, a successful developer, fell on hard times after the collapse of a boom market in real estate. He began to play fast and loose, courting trouble on several fronts. See, e.g., United States v. Lilly, 983 F.2d 300…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Ruben Ortiz, A/K/A Ruben Ortiz De Jesus, United States of America v. Felix Nunez, A/K/A Felix Nunez MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Frances SladeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. William A. DietzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- United States v. PierroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. ChiaradioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- United States v. DeMasiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. VizcarraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Rivera-AliceaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.