Legal Opinion
Willie Livingston Hill v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 29, 2002No. 00-56480PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge.
Willie Livingston Hill (“Hill”) filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court denied the petition as procedurally barred. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Hill was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of California law. He appealed his conviction to the California Court of Appeal, which affirmed the conviction. Hill then filed a petition for review with the California Supreme Court, which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re WaltreusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Dennis Mark La Crosse,petitioner-Appellant v. Peggy Kernan, Warden Attorney Generalof the State OfcaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pirtle v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Frederick L. Jackson v. George J. Giurbino, Warden California State Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Willie Livingston Hill v. Ernest C. Roe, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Protsman v. PlilerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2004
- Frederick L. Jackson v. George J. Giurbino, Warden California State Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.