Legal Opinion
Willie Livingston Hill v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 5, 2003No. 00-56480PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed July 29, 2002, and appearing at 298 F.3d 796 (9th Cir.2002) is amended. The amended opinion is filed herewith.
The panel has voted unanimously to deny appellee’s petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
Appellee’s petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc are denied.
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge.
Willie Livingston Hill (“Hill”) filed his petition for writ of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re WaltreusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Dennis Mark La Crosse,petitioner-Appellant v. Peggy Kernan, Warden Attorney Generalof the State OfcaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jerry Carter v. G.J. Giurbino, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Pirtle v. California Board of Prison TermsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Samayoa v. AyersDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2009
- White v. OllisonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Carpenter v. AyersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.