Legal Opinion

Harris v. Reed

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 22, 1989No. 87-5677PublishedCited by 2,887 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun

In this case, we consider whether the ‘“plain statement’ rule” of Michigan v. Long, 463 U. S. 1032, 1042, and n. 7 (1983), applies in a case on federal habeas review as well as in a case on direct review in this Court. We hold that it does.

I

Petitioner Warren Lee Harris was convicted in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill., of murder. On direct appeal, petitioner challenged only the sufficiency of the evidence. The Appellate Court of Illinois, by an unpublished order, affirmed the conviction. App. 5; see 71 Ill. App. 3d 1113, 392 N. E. 2d 1386 (1979).

Petitioner then returned to the Circuit…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,887 opinions

  1. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Davila v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017

2,882 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API