Legal Opinion
Frederick L. Jackson v. George J. Giurbino, Warden California State Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 26, 2004No. 02-57117PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BRIGHT; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted California state prisoner Frederick L. Jackson of rape and first-degree murder with special circumstances following his trial in state superior court. Because Jackson did not personally commit the homicide in this case, his conviction depended on application of California’s felony-murder doctrine. Jackson appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for the writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, seeking to vacate his conviction and sentence of life in prison without the possibility…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Frederick Jackson v. Michael BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Robert E. Kennedy v. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Fairbank v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Antwion Thompson v. D. RunnelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Frederick L. Jackson v. George J. Giurbino, Warden California State Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.