Legal Opinion
Protsman v. Pliler
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 13, 2004No. 3:02-cv-01601PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
WHELAN, District Judge.
On August 9, 2002 Petitioner Eugene Protsman (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, commenced 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas proceedings. On November 20, 2002 Respondent Cheryl K. Pliler (“Respondent”) moved to dismiss the Petition as unexhausted and procedurally barred.
On October 14, 2003 United States Magistrate Judge Louisa S. Porter issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”), recommending that Respondent’s motion to dismiss Claim One as unexhausted be denied, but that the Court dismiss Claim Two as procedurally…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roybal v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Dennis v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Donna Lee v. Debra JacquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015