Legal Opinion

Maddox v. Hardy

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2008No. S-12246, S-12243PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal involves a controversy surrounding a large fire started by Dorene Lorenz and other persons for the purpose of clearing rubbish. Russell Maddox, a next-door neighbor, sued Lorenz and other parties he thought were involved for damages the fire caused to his home-based business and property. Lorenz counterclaimed, primarily stating claims based on Maddox's behavior toward her after the fire. The superior court dismissed Lorenz's counterclaims and all of Maddox's claims except his nuisance action. At trial, the jury found in favor of Maddox and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gates v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. French v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Kollodge v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. HaleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jachetta v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Flint Hills Resources Alaska, LLC v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Lindbo v. Colaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Riddle v. LanserAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Kazan v. Dough Boys, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API