Legal Opinion

Reffner v. Consolidation Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1935No. Appeal, 133PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The only controverted question in this workmen’s compensation case is whether the disability from which the claimant was suffering at the date of the award resulted from such “violence to the physical structure of [his] body,” on April 10, 1933, as amounted to an “injury by an accident,” within the contemplation of Section 301 of our Workmen’s Compensation Law of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736. The referee awarded compensation for total disability upon the ground that a sudden “twist” by claimant of his body, in the course of his employment in one of the mines of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Betts v. American Stores Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Keck v. John Mullen Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Cowell v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Hamilton v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Witt v. Witt's Food Mkt. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Ferraro v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Brodbeck v. W. F. Trimble & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Mager v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API