Ferraro v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Cunningham, J.,
Opinion by
The broad and fundamental question of law involved under this appeal in a workmen’s compensation case is whether the claimant has met the burden of proving by substantial and competent evidence that his disability was caused by an “injury by an accident in the course of his employment” (within the meaning of Section 301 of our Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, 77 PS §411), rather than by the presence of certain conceded spinal deformities and the natural progress of a preexisting osteo-arthritis.
The referee made an award for total disability; the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Monahan v. Seeds & DurhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Parks v. Miller Printing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Good v. Pennsylvania Department of Property & SuppliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Kline v. KiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Balaban v. SevereSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Rathmell v. Wesleyville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Mancuso v. MancusoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.