Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Pennsylvania R. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1929No. Appeal, 120PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from a judgment affirming the workmen’s compensation authorities’ award to plaintiff for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him as the result of an accident in defendant’s machine shop, where he was employed as a drill press worker.

The evidence shows that Hamilton, who testified that he was in good health at the time, in the course of his employment lifted and changed the position of an iron coupler yoke, weighing between 175 and 200 pounds; that, while lifting this weight, he was seized with a severe pain in the back which he described as “a twist,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tracey v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Durga v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Potter v. ClaarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Witt v. Witt's Food Mkt. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Falls v. Tenn. Furn. Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Cowell v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. St. John v. U. Piccolo Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API