Legal Opinion

Brodbeck v. W. F. Trimble & Sons Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1942No. Appeal, 68PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kenworthey, J.,

Opinion by

The sole question in this workmen’s compensation case is whether claimant, 1 on November 30, 1939, sus tamed an “injury by an accident” within the meaning of See. 301 of our Workmen’s Compensation Law. 2

On the date in question, claimant was seventy-seven years of age. For some years he had been suffering from a “rather severe” osteoarthritis of the lower back for which he was wearing a brace. He was employed by defendant as a construction supervisor. His work frequently required him to walk up and down an inclined plank leading into the building under construction.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Witt v. Witt's Food Mkt. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Royko v. Logan Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Betts v. American Stores Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Paydo v. Union Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Buck v. ArndtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Rovere v. Interstate Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Apker v. Crown Can Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Corbeil v. A. & P. STORESSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Apker v. Crown Can Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API