Legal Opinion
Redevelopment Agency of City of Huntington Park v. Norm's Slauson
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1985No. B007556PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COMPTON, Acting P. J.
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Park (Agency) instituted this action in eminent domain to take four lots belonging to Norm’s Slauson restaurant (Norm’s). The lots constitute a major portion of Norm’s parking area.
The trial court ruled that the Agency had no right to take the property. The Agency has appealed. We affirm.
Norm’s started business at the present location in 1959, and in 1968 acquired the last of the property which constitutes the parking area. That lot was purchased from the City of Huntington Park (City) and is one of the lots which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- City of Los Angeles v. KeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
3Cited by16 opinions
- Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. DusekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- City of Saratoga v. HinzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Redevelopment Agency v. Rados Bros.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Ocean Harbor House Homeowners Ass'n v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- City of Stockton v. Marina Towers LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.