Legal Opinion

Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. Dusek

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1987No. Docket Nos. G002324, G002546PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALLIN, J.

The Anaheim Redevelopment Agency (Agency) appeals a judgment dismissing its complaint in eminent domain to acquire the Duseks’ Pickwick Hotel. Appalled by what they contend was judicial usurpation of a legislative function, the Agency and amici curiae argue the trial court erred by granting the Duseks’ motion for judgment (Code Civ. Proc., §631.8) 1 based on the failure to include specific findings of fact in a resolution of necessity. In this case of first impression we must decide whether the Legislature intended to impose a duty on all condemning agencies to make specific…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority v. HenslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Briggs v. City of Rolling Hills EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. City of Saratoga v. HinzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Joint Council of Interns & Residents v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Redevelopment Agency v. Rados Bros.California Court of Appeal · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API