Legal Opinion
Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency v. Duncan
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 22, 1983No. Civ. 65177PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POTTER, Acting P. J.
The Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency (hereinafter Agency) appeals from a judgment dismissing its eminent domain proceedings against the owners of a parcel of real property within its redevelopment area after a legal issue trial on the question of whether the property was subject to condemnation.
Evidence at the trial established that defendants, David and Marilyn F. Duncan, are the owners of a parcel of real property located within the boundaries of an area designated as the Huntington Park Industrial Redevelopment Project (hereinafter Project). The Duncans own…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Alford v. PiernoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Fair v. Fountain Valley School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Fellom v. Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Sanguinetti v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Building Industry Ass'n v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. DusekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Gordon v. HorsleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Redevelopment Agency of City of Huntington Park v. Norm's SlausonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Santa Cruz County Redevelopment Agency v. IzantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.