Legal Opinion
Ocean Harbor House Homeowners Ass'n v. California Coastal Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 23, 2008No. H031129PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J.—
Statement of the Case
Plaintiff Ocean Harbor House Homeowners Association (Homeowners) sought a coastal development permit from defendant California Coastal Commission (the Commission) to build a seawall to protect their condominium complex from erosion that threatened its structural integrity. The Commission granted the permit but as a condition required Homeowners to pay a fee to mitigate the loss of an acre of beach, the fee to be used toward the purchase of beach property elsewhere. Homeowners challenged the fee by petition for a writ of administrative mandate (Code…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- McAllister v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Cal. Coastal Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Cal Building Indus. etc. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Casa Mira Homeowners Assn. v. Cal. Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.