Legal Opinion
City of Saratoga v. Hinz
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 20, 2004No. H023549PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J.
In this eminent domain action, defendant property owner Lester F. Hinz, Jr., appeals a judgment that rejected his challenges to the resolution of necessity adopted by the City of Saratoga (the City) when it decided to condemn an easement over a portion of Hinz’s property to improve a private road so that the road might be accepted into the City’s system of public streets. The road improvement project was undertaken and financed by the Vessing Road Assessment District (VRAD), a special assessment district composed of property owners who own parcels that adjoin Hinz’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Beach v. Ocwen Federal BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Estate of GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- MacIsaac v. Waste Management Collection & Recycling, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Santa Clara County Open Space AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Price v. Starbucks Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- O'GRADY v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Nelson v. Pearson Ford Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.