Misiurka v. Maple Hill Farms, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s granting of the intervening plaintiff’s motion for apportionment of a judgment. The plaintiff’s employer intervened in the plaintiff’s personal injury action in order to recover monies it paid the plaintiff under the Workers’ Compensation Act, General Statutes §§ 31-291 through 31-355a. The plaintiff claims the trial court erred (1) in denying the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the intervening complaint as untimely filed, (2) in granting the intervening plaintiff’s motion for apportionment of the stipulated judgment, and (3) in failing to award…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Hurlbut v. LemelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- State v. CosbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Kulis v. MollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Vaillancourt v. New Britain Machine/LittonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Skrzypiec v. NoonanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Baker v. CordiscoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Bower v. D'OnfroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Johndrow v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.