Legal Opinion
Vaillancourt v. New Britain Machine/Litton
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 12, 1993No. 14503PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The dispositive issue in this case is whether, under General Statutes (Rev. to 1983) § 31-349,1 notice to transfer liability to the Second *385Injury and Compensation Assurance Fund (Fund) must be given to the Fund ninety days prior to: (1) the expiration of the first one hundred four weeks of the claimant’s disability; or (2) the expiration of the first one hundred four weeks of compensation payments made to the claimant by his employer. The defendants New Britain Machine/Litton (New Britain Machine) and Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers)2 appealed to the compensation review division from…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Rose v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Davis v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. DeFrancescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.