Legal Opinion

American Sanitary Rag Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 7, 1958No. 161-57PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to recover a portion of the contract price paid defendant for surplus sun helmets purchased under an “as is, where is” form of contract on the ground that one third of the sun helmets were not as described in the invitation for bids. Defendant has moved for summary judgment relying on the petition and the contract, composed of the invitation, bid and acceptance, which are attached as an exhibit to defendant’s motion.

In response to an invitation for bids issued by the Naval Supply Center, Disposal Division, Department of the Navy, Oakland, California, plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. F. C. HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. American Elastics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Triad Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
  4. M. Samuel & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  5. S. Snyder Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Stoddard Wendle Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. United States v. Robert W. AgnewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. Pia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  4. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  5. Knieper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API