Legal Opinion
M. Samuel & Sons v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 7, 1925No. C-760PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge
This is a suit for damages for alleged breach of contract in the sale by the War Department on behalf of defendant of certain shells. Plaintiff claims that it did not get what it purchased and thereby suffered a loss.
The Government on September 23, 1922, sent to plaintiff and others a circular proposal covering the sale of certain surplus materials and supplies in the form of shells and shell forgings located at the Toledo Ordnance Depot. The material was separated into three lots and numbered 1, 2, and 3, each lot being separately and briefly and generally-described in the proposal. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Erie Coal & Coke Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Lipshitz & Cohen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Hummel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923
- Lovell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
3Cited by10 opinions
- Statesman Savings Holding Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Triad Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
- American Sanitary Rag Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- ROCHESTER IRON AND METAL CO. v. the UNITED STATESUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- American Elastics, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.