United States v. F. C. Hathaway
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
Appellee, F. C. Hathaway, brought this action in the District Court under the Tucker Act 1 to recover $10,000 in damages from the United States for alleged breach of a contract of sale, as modified, and to have the contract reformed by reducing the purchase price by one-half. 2 The United States denied breach; challenged plaintiff’s right to “reformation” and counterclaimed for the unpaid balance due on the contract. The District Court granted plaintiff’s prayer for a fifty percent reduction of the purchase price and entered judgment accordingly. 3 The Government here…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Day v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. SilvertonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- American Elastics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Lipshitz & Cohen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Maguire & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,397 Lawrence J. Beecher v. Charles R. Able, and Four Other Actions, McDonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- In Re Crystal Properties, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Robert W. AgnewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- McNamara Construction of Manitoba, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.