Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert W. Agnew

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 3, 1970No. 23719PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The questions presented are whether the District Court erred in (1) dismissing defendant’s counterclaim (incorrectly designated as a cross-complaint) ; (2) granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment; and (3) entering judgment in favor of plaintiff.

The United States cannot be sued without its consent. The filing of a suit in the name of the United States does not amount to a waiver of sovereign immunity subjecting the United States to an affirmative adverse judgment on a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. F. C. HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Standard Magnesium Corporation, a Kansas Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  3. Varkell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. American Sanitary Rag Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  5. Robert R. Stalik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
  2. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
  3. United States v. John & Patricia FormaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
  5. United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API