Legal Opinion

Knieper v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 23, 1997No. 94-376CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

The above-captioned case comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). The plaintiffs, Kenneth J. Knieper and Mary L. Knieper, allege that the defendant, the United States, acting through the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), committed a breach of contract and a breach of warranty, or, in the alternative, a mutual mistake was committed,1 due to the absence of a serviceable well on the property purchased by the plaintiffs from the defendant.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Regan v. Spicer Hb, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Exxon Research & Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  3. Ju v. CarterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Westdale Northwest Center, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  5. Westdale Northwest Center, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API