Legal Opinion
Martin v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 23, 1996No. Cong.Ref. No. 94-1038XPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion
*87 REPORT OF THE HEARING OFFICER
ROBINSON, Hearing Officer:
This case, originally filed as case No. 213-89C, is before the court pursuant to S.Res. 136, which refers S. 1325 entitled “A Bill for the Relief of Horace Martin” on cross-motions for summary judgment. Both parties request summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The United States moved for summary judgment on November 7,1995, and plaintiff filed a cross-motion for summary judgment and a memorandum in opposition to defendant’s motion on January 11, 1996. Oral arguments were heard on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- King v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Collins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pratt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Banfi Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Koby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002
- Banfi Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.