Conservation Force, Inc. v. Manning
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to determine whether Arizona’s 10% cap on nonresident hunting of bull elk throughout the state and of antlered deer north of the Colorado River substantially affects commerce such that the dormant Commerce Clause applies to the regulation. We hold that it does. We further hold that the regulation discriminates against interstate commerce, but that Arizona has legitimate interests in conserving its population of game and maintaining recreational opportunities for its citizens. We remand for further proceedings to determine whether Arizona has met its…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Association Des Eleveurs De Canards Et D'Oies Du Quebec v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- National Association of Optometrists & Opticians Lenscrafters, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Sam Francis Foundation v. Christies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Schutz v. State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. BerchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.