Legal Opinion
Schutz v. State of Wyoming
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 11, 2005No. 03-8051PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.
The question in this case is whether three Wyoming statutes unconstitutionally limit equal access to hunting opportunities for nonresidents. Donald Schütz, a Florida resident, brings this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against the state of Wyoming and various state officials representing the game and fish commission (together “Wyoming”) for allegedly violating his constitutional rights. Relying on the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the so-called “dormant” Commerce Clause of Article. I, Section 8, of the United States Constitution, he claims that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Teigen v. RenfrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Christian Heritage Academy, a Private Corporation v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Association, a Not-For-Profit AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Burke v. Utah Transit Authority & Local 382Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Pioneer Centres Holding Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan & Trust v. Alerus Financial, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Hill Ex Rel. New Mexico Educational Retirement Fund v. Vanderbilt Capital Advisors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.