Legal Opinion
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. Berch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 8, 2014No. 13-17082PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-Appellants (Plaintiffs) National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdictional Practice (NAAMJP), Allison S. Girvin, and Mark Anderson filed suit against justices of the Arizona Supreme Court challenging Arizona Supreme Court Rule 34(f) (the AOM Rule), which describes how experienced attorneys can be admitted on motion to the State Bar of Arizona (Arizona Bar). The AOM Rule permits admission on motion to the Arizona Bar for attorneys who are admitted to practice law in states that permit Arizona attorneys to be admitted to the bars of those…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jacoby & Meyers, LLP v. Presiding Justices of the First, Second, Third & Fourth Departments, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- National Ass'n for Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. CastilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. SimandleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdictional Practice v. CastilleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.