Legal Opinion

Skaggs v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1954No. L. A. 22977PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

From a judgment awarding plaintiff the recovery of certain sums found to be due him as pension payments from the city and declaring his right to receive the pension in the future, both parties appeal. Defendant attacks the judgment in its entirety, while plaintiff appeals from the portion thereof which denies him recovery of pension payments for a period of some five years preceding the date from which the court determined the past due payments should be computed. We have concluded that plaintiff should prevail with respect to both appeals.

The facts are not disputed and findings were waived…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Wallace v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Essick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. James Mills v. City of CovinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Pearson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API