Legal Opinion

Pearson v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1957No. L. A. 24637PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying and dismissing his petition for mandate to compel defendants to receive from him a sum of money sufficient to make plaintiff “fully paid up in his retirement right” in the Peace Officers Retirement System, and thereupon to retire him with a pension, and to either conduct a hearing with respect to certain charges filed with the Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission or dismiss those charges and restore him to his position as a deputy sheriff in order that he may retire as provided by law. We have concluded that the judgment should be reversed and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Steen v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Wallace v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Wilson v. BevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Healy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Stephens v. ToomeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API