McCloskey v. Kreling
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
Action by the owner of certain houses in the city of San Francisco to enjoin the continuance of an adjacent wooden building, which was built in violation of the ordinance establishing the fire limits. The court below gave judgment in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.
We think the ordinance is a valid one. (Const., art. 11, sec. 11; 1 Dillon on Municipal Corporations, 3d ed., sec. 405; Amyx v. Taber, 23 Cal. 370; Ex parte Shrader, 33 Cal. 279; Ex parte Smith, 38 Cal. 702; Johnson v. Simonton, 43 Cal. 242; Ex parte Delaney, 43 Cal. 479; Ex parte Casinello, 62 Cal. 538;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Inre Yick WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Ex parte Smith & KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Ex parte ShraderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Johnson v. SimontonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Ex parte MoynierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Odd Fellows' Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- First National Bank v. SarllsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Commonwealth v. MaletskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Dean v. Powell Undertaking Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Sullivan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.