Legal Opinion

Ex parte Shrader

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1867PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Shafter, J.:

The petitioner was convicted in the Police Court of the City and County of San Francisco of keeping and maintaining a slaughter house within certain limits, in violation of an order of the Board of Supervisors of the said city and county. The order is as follows : “ ISTo person shall establish or maintain any slaughter house; keep heards of more than five swine; cure or keep hides, skins or peltry; slaughter cattle, swine, sheep or any other kind of animal; pursue or maintain, or carry on any other business or occupation offen- . sive to the senses or prejudicial to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte AndrewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Vanderbilt v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1827

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Odd Fellows' Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Ex parte LaceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Smith v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Paramount Rock Co. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. In Re JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API