Dean v. Powell Undertaking Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
This is an action to abate an- anticipated nuisance. The plaintiffs had judgment in the trial court and the defendant has appealed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Plaintiffs and defendant own lands in the same general neighborhood in the city of Fresno. Plaintiffs and others use their lands for residential purposes, but there are, in the neighborhood, some business establishments. As the trial court found the district to be a residence district or neighborhood, we will consider the case in accordance with the finding1 of the trial court. The plaintiffs’ lands are on Coast…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Saier v. JoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Varney & Green v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Judson v. L.A. Suburban Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Densmore v. Evergreen Camp No. 147Washington Supreme Court · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Jardine v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Bragg v. IvesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1927
- L. D. Pearson & Son v. BonnieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Strong v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Batcheller v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.