Ex parte Moynier
California Supreme Court
Application foi a Avrit of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court..
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
The prisoner was arrested and is in custody for a violation of section 4, of order No. 1719, of the board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisgo. The ordinance was approved June 25, 1883. Section 4 declares that “no person or persons owning or employed in the public laundries or public wash-houses provided for in section 1 of this order shall wash or iron clothes between the hours of ten o’clock p. M. and six o’clock A. M., nor upon any portion of that day known as Sunday.” Section 1 declares it to be unlawful for *35any person to establish, maintain, or carry on the business of…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Chaires v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- In Re SumidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Inre Yick WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Ex parte FiskeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.