Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Hayes

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 24, 1995No. 940416-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Judge:

Kenneth and Rebecca Palmer (the Palm-ers) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Edward and Stephanie Hayes (the Hayeses). The Hayeses cross appeal from the trial court’s denial of their request for attorney fees. We affirm.

FACTS

The Palmers offered their house for sale through Maple Hills Realty. On December 7, 1992, the Hayeses, also represented by Maple Hills Realty, entered into an Earnest Money Sales Agreement (Agreement) with the Palmers. The Hayeses gave Maple Hills Realty $2000 as an Earnest Money Deposit pursuant to the Agreement.

In January…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ron Case Roofing & Asphalt Paving, Inc. v. BlomquistUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Andreasen v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Angelos v. First Interstate Bank of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Neiderhauser Builders & Development Corp. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  5. Close v. BlumenthalUtah Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Maynard v. WhartonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  2. Chase v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  3. Atcitty Ex Rel. Atcitty v. Board of Education of the San Juan County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  4. McKeon v. CrumpCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  5. Rocky Mountain Hospitality v. Mountain ClassicUtah Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API