Legal Opinion

Close v. Blumenthal

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1960No. 9196PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice.

Defendants appeal from a judgment for specific performance of an earnest money agreement for the purchase of real property.

On the 28th day of April, 1959, at Provo, Utah, defendants Harold and Virginia Blu-menthal, in connection with buying a home, signed a document entitled “Earnest Money Receipt and Offer to Purchase,”'which was also signed by the plaintiff, Wayne C. Close, *53as seller. The agreement called for $500 at the time it was signed, which was paid, and for the remaining $25,500 of the purchase •price to he paid by June 1, 1959. The defendants did not pay this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andreasen v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  2. McMullin v. ShimminUtah Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Selvig v. Blockbuster Enterprises, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Palmer v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  3. Dowding v. Land Funding LimitedUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. McKeon v. CrumpCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  5. Rocky Mountain Hospitality v. Mountain ClassicUtah Supreme Court · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API