Andreasen v. Hansen
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs Andreasen recovered judgment against defendants Hansen based upon the failure of the defendants to go through with the purchase of a duplex after making a written offer and depositing $50 thereon. Defendants appeal.
Plaintiffs had listed the duplex for sale with the Holt Realty Co. On January 29, 1956, a Sunday, an agent of that company persuaded the Hansens to submit an offer of $15,000 and to make a deposit of $50. The agent filled out a form entitled “Earnest Money Receipt and Offer to *372Purchase” and requested the defendants to sign, which they did. They…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Perkins v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Jacobson v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Carlson v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Cooley v. CallUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Hoyt v. Wasatch Homes, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re BoothUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1982
- Bunnell v. BillsUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- Dehahn v. InnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Peery v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Cady v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.