Legal Opinion

McKeon v. Crump

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 1, 2002No. 20010121-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Judge:

11 Daniel and Lisa McKeon (the McKeons) appeal the trial court's grant of Kenneth and Amy Crump's (the Crumps) motion to dismiss with prejudice based on the McKeons' failure to return the earnest money deposit to the Crumps before filing suit. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

12 On October 25, 1999, the McKeons and the Crumps entered into a Real Estate Purchase Contract (the Purchase Contract) for the sale of the McKeons' home to the Crumps. As part of the Purchase Contract, the Crumps paid the McKeons $2,500 as an earnest money deposit. The Crumps invoked the appraisal condition…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Andreasen v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Angelos v. First Interstate Bank of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Cook v. Covey-Ballard Motor Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Hansen v. Department of Financial InstitutionsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  5. Close v. BlumenthalUtah Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Groberg v. Housing Opportunities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  2. Rocky Mountain Hospitality v. Mountain ClassicUtah Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Mountain Courtyard Suites v. WysongDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020
  4. Selvig v. Blockbuster Enterprises, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. U.S. General, Inc. v. JensonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API