Legal Opinion

State v. Norman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1972No. 7215SC338PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The defendant assigns as error the Court’s denial of his motion for judgment as of nonsuit made at the close of the State’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence. The defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to show an intent to commit rape.

The requisites of the crime with which defendant is charged were recently stated by Justice Sharp in State v. Hudson, 280 N.C. 74, 185 S.E. 2d 189 (1971) :

“. . . To convict a defendant on the charge of an assault with an intent to commit rape the State must prove not only an assault but that the defendant intended to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. State v. GammonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. Van McDougallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. RushingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API