State v. Norman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The defendant assigns as error the Court’s denial of his motion for judgment as of nonsuit made at the close of the State’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence. The defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to show an intent to commit rape.
The requisites of the crime with which defendant is charged were recently stated by Justice Sharp in State v. Hudson, 280 N.C. 74, 185 S.E. 2d 189 (1971) :
“. . . To convict a defendant on the charge of an assault with an intent to commit rape the State must prove not only an assault but that the defendant intended to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. GammonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. Van McDougallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. RushingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.