State v. Rushing
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*64WELLS, Judge.
By his assignments of error, defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to support defendant’s convictions of attempted rape and first degree burglary. In order to support a conviction, each element of the charged offense must be supported by “more than a scintilla” of evidence, State v. Summit, 301 N.C. 591, 273 S.E. 2d 425, cert. denied, 451 U.S. 970, 101 S.Ct. 2048, 68 L.Ed. 2d 349 (1981), which means “substantial evidence.” See State v. Smith, 40 N.C. App. 72, 252 S.E. 2d 535 (1979). The evidence must be sufficient to convince a rational finder of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. BrayboyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. O'NEALCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. MangumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.